The Last Supper (Leonardo da Vinci)

The Last Supper
Artist Leonardo da Vinci
Year 1495–1498
Type tempera on gesso, pitch and mastic
Dimensions 460 cm × 880 cm (181 in × 346 in)
Location Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan

The Last Supper (Italian: Il Cenacolo or L'Ultima Cena) is a 15th century mural painting in Milan created by Leonardo da Vinci for his patron Duke Ludovico Sforza and his duchess Beatrice d'Este. It represents the scene of The Last Supper from the final days of Jesus as narrated in the Gospel of John 13:21, when Jesus announces that one of his Twelve Apostles would betray him.

Contents

The painting

The Last Supper measures 450 × 870 centimeters (15 feet × 29 ft) and covers the back wall of the dining hall at the monastery of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy. The theme was a traditional one for refectories, although the room was not a refectory at the time that Leonardo painted it. The main church building had only recently been completed (in 1497), but was remodeled by Bramante, hired by Ludovico Sforza to build a Sforza family mausoleum.[1] The painting was commissioned by Sforza to be the centerpiece of the mausoleum.[2] The lunettes above the main painting, formed by the triple arched ceiling of the refectory, are painted with Sforza coats-of-arms. The opposite wall of the refectory is covered by the Crucifixion fresco by Giovanni Donato da Montorfano, to which Leonardo added figures of the Sforza family in tempera. (These figures have deteriorated in much the same way as has The Last Supper.) Leonardo began work on The Last Supper in 1495 and completed it in 1498—he did not work on the painting continuously. This beginning date is not certain, as "the archives of the convent have been destroyed and our meagre documents date from 1497 when the painting was nearly finished."[3]

The Last Supper specifically portrays the reaction given by each apostle when Jesus said one of them would betray him. All twelve apostles have different reactions to the news, with various degrees of anger and shock. From left to right:

In the 19th century, a manuscript (The Notebooks Leonardo Da Vinci pg. 232) was found with their names; before this only Judas, Peter, John and Jesus were positively identified.

In common with other depictions of The Last Supper from this period, Leonardo seats the diners on one side of the table, so that none of them have their backs to the viewer. Most previous depictions excluded Judas by placing him alone on the opposite side of the table from the other eleven disciples and Jesus or placing halos around all the disciples except Judas. Leonardo instead has Judas lean back into shadow. Jesus is predicting that his betrayer will take the bread at the same time he does to Saints Thomas and James to his left, who react in horror as Jesus points with his left hand to a piece of bread before them. Distracted by the conversation between John and Peter, Judas reaches for a different piece of bread not noticing Jesus too stretching out with his right hand towards it. (Matthew 26: 17-46). The angles and lighting draw attention to Jesus, whose head is located at the vanishing point for all perspective lines.

The painting contains several references to the number 3, which represents the Christian belief in the Holy Trinity. The Apostles are seated in groupings of three; there are three windows behind Jesus; and the shape of Jesus' figure resembles a triangle. There may have been other references that have since been lost as the painting deteriorated.

Medium

Leonardo da Vinci painted The Last Supper on a dry wall rather than on wet plaster, so it is not a true fresco. Because a fresco cannot be modified as the artist works, Leonardo instead chose to seal the stone wall with a layer of pitch, gesso and mastic, then paint onto the sealing layer with tempera. Because of the method used, the piece began to deteriorate a few years after Leonardo finished it.

Two early copies of The Last Supper are known to exist, presumably the work of Leonardo's assistant. The copies are almost the size of the original, and have survived with a wealth of original detail still intact.[5]

Damage and restorations

As early as 1517 the painting was starting to flake. By 1556—less than sixty years after it was finished — Leonardo's biographer Giorgio Vasari described the painting as already "ruined" and so deteriorated that the figures were unrecognizable. In 1652 a doorway was cut through the (then unrecognisable) painting, and later bricked up; this can still be seen as the irregular arch shaped structure near the center base of the painting. It is believed, through early copies, that Jesus' feet were in a position symbolizing the forthcoming crucifixion. In 1768 a curtain was hung over the painting for the purpose of protection; it instead trapped moisture on the surface, and whenever the curtain was pulled back, it scratched the flaking paint.

A first restoration was attempted in 1726 by Michelangelo Bellotti, who filled in missing sections with oil paint then varnished the whole mural. This repair did not last well and another restoration was attempted in 1770 by Giuseppe Mazza. Mazza stripped off Bellotti's work then largely repainted the painting; he had redone all but three faces when he was halted due to public outrage. In 1796 French troops used the refectory as an armory; they threw stones at the painting and climbed ladders to scratch out the Apostles' eyes. The refectory was then later used as a prison; it is not known if any of the prisoners may have damaged the painting. In 1821 Stefano Barezzi, an expert in removing whole frescoes from their walls intact, was called in to remove the painting to a safer location; he badly damaged the centre section before realizing that Leonardo's work was not a fresco. Barezzi then attempted to reattach damaged sections with glue. From 1901 to 1908, Luigi Cavenaghi first completed a careful study of the structure of the painting, then began cleaning it. In 1924 Oreste Silvestri did further cleaning, and stabilised some parts with stucco.

A protective structure was built in front of the da Vinci wall fresco. This photo shows the bombing damage in 1943, suggesting the magnitude of the greater damage which was averted.

During World War II, on August 15, 1943, the refectory was struck by a bomb; protective sandbagging prevented the painting from being struck by bomb splinters, but it may have been damaged further by the vibration. From 1951 to 1954 another clean-and-stabilise restoration was undertaken by Mauro Pelliccioli.

Major restoration

The painting as it looked in the 1970s

The painting's appearance in the late 1970s was badly deteriorated. From 1978 to 1999 Pinin Brambilla Barcilon guided a major restoration project which undertook to permanently stabilize the painting, and reverse the damage caused by dirt, pollution, and the misguided 18th and 19th century restoration attempts. Since it had proved impractical to move the painting to a more controlled environment, the refectory was instead converted to a sealed, climate controlled environment, which meant bricking up the windows. Then, detailed study was undertaken to determine the painting's original form, using scientific tests (especially infrared reflectoscopy and microscopic core-samples), and original cartoons preserved in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle. Some areas were deemed unrestorable. These were re-painted with watercolour in subdued colours intended to indicate they were not original work, whilst not being too distracting.

This restoration took 21 years and on May 28, 1999 the painting was put back on display, although intending visitors are required to book ahead and can only stay for 15 minutes. When it was unveiled, considerable controversy was aroused by the dramatic changes in colours, tones, and even some facial shapes. James Beck, professor of art history at Columbia University and founder of ArtWatch International, had been a particularly strong critic.

Rumours

A common rumour surrounding the painting is that the same model was used for both Jesus and Judas. The story often goes that the innocent-looking young man, a baker, posed at nineteen for Jesus. Some years later Leonardo discovered a hard-bitten criminal as the model for Judas, not realizing he was the same man. There is no evidence that Leonardo used the same model for both figures and the story usually overestimates the time it took Leonardo to finish the mural.[6]

Some writers identify the person to Jesus' right not with the Apostle John (as is supposed by iconographical tradition and confirmed by art historians) but with Mary Magdalene. This theory was the topic of the book The Templar Revelation, and plays a central role in Dan Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code (2003). They propose that the person in the painting seated, from a viewer’s point-of-view, to the left of Jesus is Mary Magdalene rather than John the Apostle, as most art historians identify that person. By the same token the Apostle Philip (third figure to the left of Jesus, and the only other beardless male) could possibly be another woman (Martha?). Furthermore, they point out that the body angles between Jesus and the Apostle John form the letter M, a reference to the Magdalene, and that she and Jesus are dressed in similar but oppositely colored clothes, a negative image of each other. They also mention a number of other signs: a mystery knife pointed at one of the characters, that Leonardo da Vinci himself is in the painting with his face pointing away from Jesus, and that Jesus is confronted by an admonishing hand to his right making “the John gesture,” an index finger pointing up.

Castagno's version of The Last Supper, depicting St. John sleeping

The above points are often debated with the following counter-arguments:

Alternative theories

There have also been other popular speculations about the work. It has been suggested that there is no cup in the painting, yet Jesus' left hand is pointing to the Eucharist and his right to a glass of wine. (There are several glasses on the table, but they are difficult to see owing to the work's deterioration and restorations.) This is not the glorified chalice of legend as Leonardo insisted on realistic paintings. He often criticised Michelangelo for painting muscular, superhuman figures in the Sistine Chapel.

Further it is claimed that if one looks above the figure of Bartholomew, a Grail-like image appears on the wall. Whether Leonardo meant this to be a representation of the Holy Grail cannot be known, since as pointed out earlier there is a glass on the table within Christ's reach. The "Grail image" has become noticed probably because it only appears when viewing the painting in small scale reproductions. Zooming in on the painting reveals a cluster of geometrical shapes, possibly intended to represent marble wall decoration, or more likely, paneling on a door.[9] They only appear to form a golden chalice when parts are deliberately occluded.

Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper superimposed with its mirror image

Slavisa Pesci, "an information technologist and amateur scholar", superimposed Leonardo da Vinci's version of The Last Supper with its mirror image (with both images of Jesus lined up) and claimed[10][11] that the resultant picture has a Templar knight on the far left, a woman in orange holding a swaddled baby in her arms to the left of Christ, and the Holy Grail in the form of a chalice in front of Christ.

Giovanni Maria Pala, an Italian musician, has indicated that the positions of hands and loaves of bread can be interpreted as notes on a musical staff, and if read from right to left, as was characteristic of Leonardo's writing, form a musical composition.[12][13]

Sabrina Sforza Galitzia, a Vatican researcher, claimed to have deciphered the "mathematical and astrological" puzzle in Leonardo's The Last Supper. She said that he foresaw the end of the world in a "universal flood" which would begin on March 21, 4006 and end on November 1 the same year. He believed that this would mark "a new start for humanity".[14]

The Last Supper in culture

The Last Supper made in salt in Wieliczka Salt Mine (Poland)

Painting, mosaic and photography

A 16th century oil on canvas copy is conserved in the abbey of Tongerlo, Antwerp, Belgium. It reveals many details that are no longer visible on the original. The Roman mosaic artist Giacomo Raffaelli made another life-sized copy (1809–1814) in the Viennese Minoritenkirche.

In 1955, Salvador Dalí painted The Sacrament of the Last Supper, with Jesus portrayed as blonde and clean shaven, pointing upward to a spectral torso while the apostles are gathered around the table heads bowed so that none may be identified. It is reputed to be one of the most popular paintings in the collection of the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.

Modern art

In 1986 Andy Warhol was commissioned to produce a series of paintings based on the The Last Supper that were exhibited initially in Milan. This was his last series of paintings before his death.[15]

Sculptor Marisol Escobar was inspired by The Last Supper, rendering it as a life-sized, three-dimensional, sculptural assemblage using painted and drawn wood, plywood, brownstone, plaster and aluminum. This work, Self-Portrait Looking at The Last Supper, (1982–84) is in New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art.[16]

In 2004, Irish artist John Byrne created "Supper", a 9.3 by 2.2 metre photo screen-printed onto vitreous enamel, depicting his modern Irish take on the painting with 13 everyday Dubliners. The piece is displayed outdoors in the Millenium Walkway north of the Millennium Bridge in Dublin.[17]

Pop culture

A scene from the South Park episode "Margaritaville", (bottom) resembles the Last Supper painting (top).

Da Vinci's painting has been parodied many times by contemporary artists. Some examples:

Notes

  1. http://www.timeout.com/milan/attractions/venue/1:7329/santa-maria-delle-grazie-the-last-supper
  2. http://brunelleschi.imss.fi.it/itineraries/itinerary/EarlyMaturityMilan.html
  3. Kenneth Clark.Leonardo da Vinci, Penguin Books 1939, 1993, p144.
  4. Cfr. Matthew 26:15; John 12:6 and 13:29.
  5. "Last Supper (copy after Leonardo)". University of the Arts, London. http://www.universalleonardo.org/work.php?id=572. Retrieved 2008-08-11. 
  6. Versions of the story can be found at the following locations Daily Blessings, The Easter Egg Archive, The Last Supper, Truth or Fiction
  7. P.B. Barcilon and P.C. Marinin, Leonardo: The Last Supper, University of Chicago Press, 1999, p19.
  8. Anwender (2006-04-14). "St. John at the Last Supper". Home.arcor.de. http://home.arcor.de/berzelmayr/st-john.html. Retrieved 2009-02-08. 
  9. Extremely detailed views of these are to be found in P.B. Barcilon and P.C. Marinin, Leonardo: The Last Supper, University of Chicago Press, 1999. pp.179, 308-11. Barcilon states that "The door's decorative molding, which probably simulated different wood grains, is embellished at the center by a clypeus motif in light tones." p.345
  10. "New Da Vinci code wreaks Web havoc". Edition.cnn.com. 2007-07-27. http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/07/27/davinci.codes.reut/. Retrieved 2009-02-08. 
  11. From correspondents in Rome (2007-07-27). "Da Vinci code 'cracked' by computer analyst". News.com.au. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22138621-5002700,00.html. Retrieved 2009-02-08. 
  12. "Leonardo's 'Last Supper' Hides True Da Vinci Code". Dsc.discovery.com. http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/11/09/last-supper-da-vinci.html?dcitc=w19-502-ak-0000. Retrieved 2009-02-08. 
  13. "Da Vinci's "Last Supper" has hidden music (includes link to recording)". Extra.beloblog.com. http://extra.beloblog.com/archives/2007/11/da_vincis_last_supper_has_hidd_1.html. Retrieved 2009-02-08. 
  14. Richard Owen (March 15, 2010). "Da Vinci 'predicted world would end in 4006' says Vatican researcher". The Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article7061704.ece. Retrieved 2010-03-17. 
  15. Haden-Guest, Anthony. "Warhol's Last Supper". artnet Magazine. http://www.artnet.com/magazine_pre2000/features/haden-guest/haden-guest8-3-99.asp. Retrieved 2010-03-12. 
  16. "Marisol (Marisol Escobar): Self-Portrait Looking at The Last Supper (1986.430.1-129)". Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1986.430.1-129. Retrieved 2010-04-03. 
  17. "DUBLIN'S LAST SUPPER: A new artwork by John Byrne". http://www.recirca.com/articles/curate/shaffrey/jbinfo.htm. Retrieved 2010-07-23. 
  18. Goldberg, Vicki (1998-09-25). "''It's a Leonardo? It's a Corot? Well, No, It's Chocolate Syrup'', New York Times, 1998". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9406EED61639F936A1575AC0A96E958260#. Retrieved 2009-02-08. 
  19. http://www.flickr.com/photos/34527294@N00/2177726792/sizes/l/
  20. "''What have you found in the 'Lost' 'Last Supper' photo?'', USA Today, 2010". USA Today. 2010-01-05. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/popcandy/post/2010/01/what-have-you-found-in-the-lost-last-supper-photo/1#. Retrieved 2010-01-05. 

External references

Steinberg, Leo. Leonardo's Incessant 'Last Supper'". New York: Zone Books, 2001.

External links